• A complex system is any system involving multiple interlocking feedback mechanisms. The corollary: they are inherently (mathematically) chaotic.

• Systems with chaotic elements are always to a degree unstable and unpredictable.

• This is not a preventable situation. And so there can be no stasis… there is always change.

• Further, theoretically, ALL complex, chaotic systems eventually collapse.

• Systems can be modified so that theoretical collapse is extended to a point beyond the useful life of the system rendering the issue moot. But it will be a constantly evolving and changing system.

• As complex GOVERNING systems experience inevitable stresses (swings away from the theoretical point of balance) modifications can be made to these systems to assist in stabilization before these “swings” turn into wars, revolutions, famines, inquisitions, jihads and all the other insanities man engages in.

Tom Crowl
http://CulturalEngineer.blogspot.com
http://www.YouTube.com/CulturalEngineer.com

The structure of the system(s) through which those opinions are determined and implemented in a representative government are primarily engineering questions (though those systems may have been created through a political process)

In that sense, both the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and other such documents here or elsewhere are actually attempts to “engineer” for good government.

In complex systems (a nation) as the social environment changes… the need to address systems of both opinion/motivation as well as implementation will need constant attention. CHAGORA is part of that effort.

No simple solution to this dilemna jumps out but it may be that improving the “process” of voter participation, particularly on the local level will kindle a greater understanding of the difficulties a leader faces.

Moreover, implementing clearer and stronger lines of opinion/motivation between voters and politicians will provide an easier path for the leader who currently must deal with an imbalanced system of influence.

A voter more involved with decision making himself… will feel a greater responsibility, and hopefully take a closer look at the complexities of an issue. I believe it may be that when there is a greater distance between leader and citizen (whether that distance is physical, psychological, economic or whatever) the citizen is more likely to embrace simplistic or even fantastical “solutions”.

I believe what I’m developing (CHAGORA) may be of assistance. But there are risks… to empower people who have felt so disconnected for such a long time is a scary thing. However… looking to “small group” decision making, you find greater engagement and capacity for appreciation and willingness to deal with suptleties.
Capability enables Responsibility!
Tom Crowl
http://CulturalEngineer.blogspot.com